Peer Review Process

The International Journal of STEM Research (IJSTEMR) implements a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and academic integrity of all submitted manuscripts. In this process, both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to maintain objectivity and fairness in evaluation.

Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes an initial screening by the editorial team to assess its relevance to the journal’s scope, adherence to submission guidelines, and overall academic quality. Manuscripts that pass this stage are assigned to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.

Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on several criteria, including originality, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, significance of findings, and contribution to the field of STEM. Based on the reviewers’ feedback, the editorial decision may be one of the following: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject.

Authors are given the opportunity to revise their manuscripts in accordance with reviewers’ comments. Revised submissions may be returned to reviewers for further evaluation before a final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief.

IJSTEMR is committed to a transparent, timely, and ethical review process, following international publishing standards and best practices to ensure the publication of high-quality scholarly work.